CEE countries bring up the rear in Europe in access to innovative MS treatments
2010-01-13
Access to innovative multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries is significantly more limited than it is in the “old” European Union countries. Access to innovative drugs and the percentage of patients treated by 2008 in Western Europe greatly surpassed the CEE region, reflecting the latter’s generally inferior economic status and the weaker condition of its healthcare systems.
Access to innovative MS drugs in CEE countries a burden on healthcare systems
The
Access to innovative treatments for multiple sclerosis in Europe , recently published report for the EFPIA, estimated that the percentage of MS patients on immunomodulating medicine in Western Europe (the “old” EU + 3) was 40-50%, and in CEE (the “new” EU) countries only 5-25%.The disparity in access to disease-modifying MS treatment (DMT) in Europe is mainly a result of two conditions: macroeconomic indicators, reflecting a country’s wealth, and thus the affordability of DMTs, and reimbursement policies which place restrictions on expensive medicines. The price level factor finally appeared not to have a significant impact on access to MS treatment. Whereas the general price level in the “new” EU countries is somewhat lower than that of the “old” EU, as a consequence of the lower prices established in the former countries prior to EU accession, the differences are not particularly substantial. This is because of the policy of manufacturers, fearing the effect of parallel trade, of keeping global drug prices fixed. The average annual cost of the disease per patient was estimated in the report to be €11,950 in the Western EU countries and €9,830 in the CEE countries.
However, the lower price levels in the CEE countries seem not to influence drug uptake. The reason is not always the affordability of the treatment in individual countries, but, rather, specific conditions governing the rules of distribution of DMTs in a given country. On the markets on which these drugs are not subject to the official approval of the payer, such as Germany, prices are at their highest, whereas on the highly-regulated markets for these treatments, e.g. Poland, where they are subject to the so-called therapeutic programme and are available only within the closed hospital distribution system, prices are much lower for patients, and manufacturers are not afraid of parallel trade. Furthermore, there are also significant MS treatment price variations among the CEE countries. The price in Slovakia is relatively close to that of Germany, and yet this is one of the countries which treats the highest number of patients. Conversely, the Czech Republic, where the price is lower than that of Slovakia, treats fewer patients. Price does, however, explain the low rate of usage in Romania, where it is the same as that of most Western European countries, and the affordability about one-third that of Germany.


The disparities in access to immunomodulative MS treatments across Europe are, in most cases, correlated with the condition of healthcare, as expensive treatments have a significant impact on the healthcare budget.
We believe, therefore, that the most important factor which affects access to innovative MS treatment is the ability of the national reimbursement systems to carry the cost of refunding such expensive therapies. Access to medicines at such prices is considered to have a significant impact on the budgets of the CEE countries. As proof of this the
Polish Health Technology Assessment Agency (AOTM), in its analysis of immunomodulative MS treatments, stated that the cost-effectiveness threshold
1 of this group of medicines is much higher than that recommended by the WHO, i.e. it is three times per capita GDP, which is regarded by the Agency as the ceiling at or below which it recommends the therapy for reimbursement.
Disparities in access to MS innovative treatments match variations in MS-related costs across Europe
The total cost of MS, defined in the EFPIA report as the proportional combined costs of healthcare, non-medical costs, production losses and informal care costs in Europe, was estimated to be €15bn. The bulk of this (€14bn) was accounted for by the old EU countries, with the estimated number of treated patients being 165,000-170,000 of a diagnosed group of 412,000 MS patients, and €650m in the CEE countries, with 59,000 diagnosed patients, where affordability remains an issue despite the lower prices. The average cost per patient was estimated in the report to be €36,000, which shows a discrepancy between Western Europe (€39,000) and the CEE countries, with an annual cost of €11,600 per patient.
The analysis of cost distribution shows the dominance of the costs which lie outside the healthcare market (i.e. production losses, informal care and non-medical costs). In the Western EU countries these constitute two-thirds of all costs, whereas biologics in both EU regions represent 12% of the total cost of MS.

Conditional reimbursement a solution for CEE countries
In most European countries a health technology assessment is introduced as part of the decision making process in the introduction of innovative drugs The quality-adjusted life-year (QUALY) cost of MS immunomodulating drugs is relatively high and, because of this, most countries have decided to restrict access to this treatment. The health authorities allocate a separate budget to reimburse the expensive drugs and organise tenders to maintain direct control over purchase and distribution for patients.

In Poland, for example, immunomodulative MS drugs are available within a therapeutic programme open only to patients who meet specified criteria. The programme is carried out by specialist centres, with drug prices specified in tenders, and the number of patients and costs are, therefore, strictly controlled. As a result of this, the number of patients treated with interferon beta1 and beta2 rose from 500 of the 50,000-60,000 diagnosed to 2,602 in H2 2009. However, the programme provides treatment for three years only. The local MS patients’ organisation has, therefore, approached the Health Ministry in the hope of having some of the restrictions eased and access extended to 15,000-16,000 patients who react positively to treatment or at least to those 5,000-6,000, who require immediate intervention.
Anna Skoczylas-Ligocka
Business Editor
PMR Publications
anna.skoczylas-ligocka@pmrpublications.com
Methodology note:
The report Access to innovative treatments for multiple sclerosis in Europe, published in October 2009, analysed 30 European countries (27 EU member states, in addition to Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey).
The MS drugs included in the report were Avonex (interferon-β-1a), Betaferon (interferon-β-1b), Copaxone (glatiramer acetate), Rebif 22/44 (interferon-β-1a), Tysabri (natalizumab), based on IMS data.
The therapeutic programmes of the National Health Fund (NFZ) are very restrictive. They contain eligibility criteria which are extra-medical in character. For example, under these criteria, a patient under 40 years of age stands a better chance of being eligible for treatment than a person who is a little older. The time limit of three years for the duration of therapy is equally inappropriate. In line with current medical knowledge, therapy should continue for as long as it is effective. The discontinuation of therapy could even lead to a deterioration in the patient’s condition. The Polish Multiple Sclerosis Society (PTSR) plans to report one such documented case to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. The highly restrictive character of the eligibility criteria leads to the percentage of MS patients in Poland in receipt of immunomodulating drugs being monstrously low. A mere 3% of patients in Poland have access to such therapies, and this is the lowest rate in Europe.
Izabela Czarnecka
President of the Polish Multiple Sclerosis Society
[1] cost effectiveness threshold per one year of living gained (LYG)